If you are interested in more detailed information on grants and cooperation agreements, there are still a few resources: while the federal agency remains involved in the delivery, the task should never be postponed so that it is carried out for the Agency. The FGCAA expressly prohibits federal authorities from using co-operative contracts to acquire real estate or services for direct use or use by the federal government. This distinction distinguishes cooperative contracts from “purchase contracts” or “acquisitions” related to FAR. This distinction is also essential to limit the protest actions made available to disappointed bidders for cooperation agreements. [Note 1] Significant participation means that scientific staff support, guide, coordinate or participate in project activities after the scientific or program staff are awarded. In general, the cost of cooperation agreements indicates that the responsibility for the implementation of the supported project rests with the recipient of the implementation of the funded and approved proposal and budget, as well as the conditions for allocation. Responsibility for monitoring and diverting the project, if any, rests with the NIJ. Moreover, substantial participation is a more relative than absolute concept. NIJ`s participation in a cooperation project will depend on the circumstances.
Examples of this include the review and approval of IJ`s implementation, monitoring and evaluation plans; The necessary review and approval of the IJ after completion of a phase of work before it passes the next phases; IJ`s verification and authorization of subcontracting or sub-subsidy; joint actions and cooperation or participation, such as between the NIJ and the laureate, in carrying out certain technical activities involved in the implementation of the project. Both cooperation contracts and grants “transfer value from the federal awarding agency or pass-through-unit to the non-federal agency to fulfill a public purpose.” Recipients of a cooperation agreement must obtain and obtain prior authorization for a conference. This could have an impact on research activities, including working group meetings, roundtables and focus groups, which fit the definition of a “conference” within the framework of the DOJ policy.